Nah. I like Chaplin but I just think that he's seriously overrated in comparison to Keaton.

Chaplin always has been more popular and always will be, but every ten years or so the critical trends go from thinking Keaton is superior to Chaplin and back again. Right now we are in a Chaplin period and you can feel the Keaton love starting to boil back up again. Two great silent comedians who are great for reasons that could not be more different (other than that they are both funny).

Very true. I simply prefer Keaton mainly because he is far more subtle in his acting (I don't think you can fault Chaplin for that, it's just that I think Keaton was far ahead of his time in that sense) and also because his gags were outrageously daring. That man had serious balls to say the least.

Alejandro Jodorowsky needs a thread.

make it den bra, but don't be putting tier forthcoming or some shit

I think that particular shade of orange is horrid. It's too pale and is a little hard to see against the white background.

i would've gone with green as the master bold or maybe just bookend two of these with the top titles.

Memento
Au Hasard Balthazar
Tokyo Story

Aight, and I'll do Jean-Pierre Melville's too.

Anyone else think that there should be a new tier for films that you should stay away from? In a director's filmography, there might be a decent film that isn't bolded as well as a godawful film. I think that there should be a new tier introduced so that it's easier to differentiate between the two.

I was thinking this would work a little better.

The bad films should be brown.

Goddamnit.

I thought you of all people would be annoyed by that colour.

My monitor is properly calibrated so it looks fine.

As is mine it's just the brighter a colour is the hardest it is to see against a white background.