DDD Home Page
DDD Music Lists Page
DDD Movie Lists Page
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 76  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:19 pm 
Offline
moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 15286
lonewolf371 wrote:
corrections wrote:
lonewolf371 wrote:
Should we have crowned Ohio State champions before the national title game in 2006? Hell no. In my opinion never ever ever crown a team champion without making them play outside their conference at the end of the season. If Ohio State and Michigan had played before Florida-Auburn that year, we would have had a rematch in 2006 as well. Wouldn't that have been such a clear indication of who the best team in the country was that year?


LSU beat two of the conference champions already. What they should have to beat 3? Florida and Ohio St. were much closer than LSU and Alabama/OK St. Everyone forgets that Florida had Michigan pretty safely cleared in the comps.

Sure, at the beginning of the season. Teams change over the course of the season. Texas in 2006 wasn't too far off from being a conference champion, and West Virginia honestly doesn't count.

Oklahoma State has Alabama cleared in the comps, just not in your ranking system.


We don't know if they've really cleared them in the comps because the human whiners in the AP were able to get the BCS to deliberately neuter the accuracy of the computers. Also the Billings had OK St. ranked ahead which doesn't count (in my book) because the methodology is certifiably insane. From my understanding if you look at all of the computer metrics that have a scoring margin component (which all say makes theirs more accurate) Alabama finishes ahead in all of them. Now I know in the drive based system I posted earlier Ok St. and Wisconsin actually ended up slipping ahead of Alabama on final results (this has a lot to do with Wisconsin getting that extra game against elite competition and Alabama's game against Georgia Southern not counting for that ranking). So this shows that Ok. St. could be better. On the other hand Georgia Southern could probably either outright beat or give a strong competition to a third of the teams on OK St.'s schedule (they'd certainly trounce Kansas) so I think it is probably not as simple. OK St. has an argument it's true (and with some of the coaches doing some ridiculous bullshit things they should be even closer).

As for the beating the conference champion point why should the results later in the season mean more? If that's the case shouldn't OK St.'s later loss be more detrimental (the wrong approach). Why is your quality of play at the end of the season more determinative of who you are as a team holistically?

And finally Florida had Michigan safely cleared in the comps and beat them out in both polls (though there was worry that they wouldn't). OK St. didn't fulfill that threshold. Furthermore, Texas was pretty far off from being a conference champion of a good conference in 2006. The Big 12 was definitely down that year. They were certainly pretty far off from being a team comparable to Oregon this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
corrections wrote:
lonewolf371 wrote:
corrections wrote:
lonewolf371 wrote:
Should we have crowned Ohio State champions before the national title game in 2006? Hell no. In my opinion never ever ever crown a team champion without making them play outside their conference at the end of the season. If Ohio State and Michigan had played before Florida-Auburn that year, we would have had a rematch in 2006 as well. Wouldn't that have been such a clear indication of who the best team in the country was that year?


LSU beat two of the conference champions already. What they should have to beat 3? Florida and Ohio St. were much closer than LSU and Alabama/OK St. Everyone forgets that Florida had Michigan pretty safely cleared in the comps.

Sure, at the beginning of the season. Teams change over the course of the season. Texas in 2006 wasn't too far off from being a conference champion, and West Virginia honestly doesn't count.

Oklahoma State has Alabama cleared in the comps, just not in your ranking system.


We don't know if they've really cleared them in the comps because the human whiners in the AP were able to get the BCS to deliberately neuter the accuracy of the computers. Also the Billings had OK St. ranked ahead which doesn't count (in my book) because the methodology is certifiably insane. From my understanding if you look at all of the computer metrics that have a scoring margin component (which all say makes theirs more accurate) Alabama finishes ahead in all of them. Now I know in the drive based system I posted earlier Ok St. and Wisconsin actually ended up slipping ahead of Alabama on final results (this has a lot to do with Wisconsin getting that extra game against elite competition and Alabama's game against Georgia Southern not counting for that ranking). So this shows that Ok. St. could be better. On the other hand Georgia Southern could probably either outright beat or give a strong competition to a third of the teams on OK St.'s schedule (they'd certainly trounce Kansas) so I think it is probably not as simple. OK St. has an argument it's true (and with some of the coaches doing some ridiculous bullshit things they should be even closer).

As for the beating the conference champion point why should the results later in the season mean more? If that's the case shouldn't OK St.'s later loss be more detrimental (the wrong approach). Why is your quality of play at the end of the season more determinative of who you are as a team holistically?

And finally Florida had Michigan safely cleared in the comps and beat them out in both polls (though there was worry that they wouldn't). OK St. didn't fulfill that threshold. Furthermore, Texas was pretty far off from being a conference champion of a good conference in 2006. The Big 12 was definitely down that year. They were certainly pretty far off from being a team comparable to Oregon this year.

The fact that OSU and Alabama are even remotely close IMO shows what a sham it is, I don't think OSU has to absolutely be better for them to be in the title game, just close and the fact that they haven't played LSU yet should get them in.

As for why they have to play at the end, teams definitely change over the course of the season. Players learn every week and get better. Michigan in 2007 went from losing Appalachian State in their first game to beating a Florida team at the end of the season that was essentially the exact same one that won the title game next year. I get keeping the regular season valuable, and for sports with massive sample sizes where regular season performance says the most about you as a team since most everyone plays each other (baseball), I'd be fine with saying the best team is the one that won the regular season. But in college football, where you have a ton of teams and they don't even come close to all playing each other. As such, every opportunity to make them play each other to determine a champion should be taken, and this would actually give the greatest statistical power in determining the champion.

Another question: do you think Florida State won the title in 1996?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:06 pm 
Offline
moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 15286
lonewolf371 wrote:
corrections wrote:
lonewolf371 wrote:
corrections wrote:

LSU beat two of the conference champions already. What they should have to beat 3? Florida and Ohio St. were much closer than LSU and Alabama/OK St. Everyone forgets that Florida had Michigan pretty safely cleared in the comps.

Sure, at the beginning of the season. Teams change over the course of the season. Texas in 2006 wasn't too far off from being a conference champion, and West Virginia honestly doesn't count.

Oklahoma State has Alabama cleared in the comps, just not in your ranking system.


We don't know if they've really cleared them in the comps because the human whiners in the AP were able to get the BCS to deliberately neuter the accuracy of the computers. Also the Billings had OK St. ranked ahead which doesn't count (in my book) because the methodology is certifiably insane. From my understanding if you look at all of the computer metrics that have a scoring margin component (which all say makes theirs more accurate) Alabama finishes ahead in all of them. Now I know in the drive based system I posted earlier Ok St. and Wisconsin actually ended up slipping ahead of Alabama on final results (this has a lot to do with Wisconsin getting that extra game against elite competition and Alabama's game against Georgia Southern not counting for that ranking). So this shows that Ok. St. could be better. On the other hand Georgia Southern could probably either outright beat or give a strong competition to a third of the teams on OK St.'s schedule (they'd certainly trounce Kansas) so I think it is probably not as simple. OK St. has an argument it's true (and with some of the coaches doing some ridiculous bullshit things they should be even closer).

As for the beating the conference champion point why should the results later in the season mean more? If that's the case shouldn't OK St.'s later loss be more detrimental (the wrong approach). Why is your quality of play at the end of the season more determinative of who you are as a team holistically?

And finally Florida had Michigan safely cleared in the comps and beat them out in both polls (though there was worry that they wouldn't). OK St. didn't fulfill that threshold. Furthermore, Texas was pretty far off from being a conference champion of a good conference in 2006. The Big 12 was definitely down that year. They were certainly pretty far off from being a team comparable to Oregon this year.

The fact that OSU and Alabama are even remotely close IMO shows what a sham it is, I don't think OSU has to absolutely be better for them to be in the title game, just close and the fact that they haven't played LSU yet should get them in.

As for why they have to play at the end, teams definitely change over the course of the season. Players learn every week and get better. Michigan in 2007 went from losing Appalachian State in their first game to beating a Florida team at the end of the season that was essentially the exact same one that won the title game next year. I get keeping the regular season valuable, and for sports with massive sample sizes where regular season performance says the most about you as a team since most everyone plays each other (baseball), I'd be fine with saying the best team is the one that won the regular season. But in college football, where you have a ton of teams and they don't even come close to all playing each other. As such, every opportunity to make them play each other to determine a champion should be taken, and this would actually give the greatest statistical power in determining the champion.

Another question: do you think Florida State won the title in 1996?


I'd have to take a look back into who they beat overall (I know they beat Florida two games before they rematched in the Sugar) but really I don't have a feel for the strength of teams that year. All I know is LSU has looked flat out unstoppable against really tough competition. I fully expect them to beat Bama and hope they do because they deserve to win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
corrections wrote:
I'd have to take a look back into who they beat overall (I know they beat Florida two games before they rematched in the Sugar) but really I don't have a feel for the strength of teams that year. All I know is LSU has looked flat out unstoppable against really tough competition. I fully expect them to beat Bama and hope they do because they deserve to win.

Yeah they probably do. And it would help in getting LSU fans to finally accept what they have in Miles.

I guess I'm just old school in wanting to see playoffs/championship games at the end of the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
A little thing I put together and posted on another forum. Total revenue by conference/school based on the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act data:

SEC ($1,200,902,412)
1. The University of Alabama ($123,910,432)
2. University of Florida ($123,008,257)
3. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College ($106,421,671)
4. Auburn University ($103,982,441)
5. The University of Tennessee ($102,495,204)
6. University of Georgia ($92,341,067)
7. University of Arkansas ($91,768,113)
8. University of Kentucky ($84,878,315)
9. University of South Carolina-Columbia ($83,704,667)
10. Texas A & M University-College Station ($74,944,301)
11. University of Missouri-Columbia ($59,005,954)
12. Vanderbilt University ($55,632,098)
13. Mississippi State University ($49,893,731)
14. University of Mississippi Main Campus ($48,916,161)

Big Ten ($1,050,478,881)
1. Ohio State University-Main Campus ($131,815,819)
2. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ($122,486,490)
3. Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus ($116,118,026)
4. University of Wisconsin-Madison ($93,594,766)
5. University of Iowa ($92,903,555)
6. University of Nebraska-Lincoln ($83,679,756)
7. Michigan State University ($80,963,182)
8. University of Minnesota-Twin Cities ($78,924,683)
9. Indiana University-Bloomington ($70,172,641)
10. Purdue University-Main Campus ($66,066,303)
11. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ($57,539,367)
12. Northwestern University ($56,214,293)

ACC ($860,547,975)
1. Florida State University ($86,946,503)
2. University of Virginia-Main Campus ($78,439,006)
3. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ($71,369,784)
4. Duke University ($67,986,188)
5. Boston College ($64,078,272)
6. Clemson University ($61,174,977)
7. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ($61,077,122)
8. University of Miami ($60,325,003)
9. University of Maryland-College Park ($57,765,018)
10. University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus ($56,044,309)
11. North Carolina State University at Raleigh ($54,711,001)
12. Syracuse University ($51,433,840)
13. Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus ($46,910,364)
14. Wake Forest University ($42,286,588)

Pac-12 ($747,943,314)
1. University of Oregon ($85,740,068)
2. Stanford University ($81,125,476)
3. University of Southern California ($75,707,273)
4. University of Washington-Seattle Campus ($70,231,336)
5. University of California-Los Angeles ($66,003,893)
6. University of California-Berkeley ($65,006,338)
7. University of Colorado Boulder ($60,923,253)
8. University of Arizona ($58,274,431)
9. Arizona State University ($55,378,783)
10. Oregon State University ($50,843,837)
11. Washington State University ($40,617,093)
12. University of Utah ($38,091,533)

Big 12 ($737,535,914)
1. University of Texas at Austin ($150,295,932)
2. University of Oklahoma Norman Campus ($104,338,843)
3. Oklahoma State University-Main Campus ($70,123,206)
4. University of Kansas ($70,028,683)
5. Kansas State University ($68,875,266)
6. Baylor University ($59,859,235)
7. West Virginia University ($58,003,719)
8. Texas Christian University ($56,245,071)
9. Texas Tech University ($51,190,970)
10. Iowa State University ($48,574,989)

Big East (Football) ($458,276,752)
1. University of Louisville ($87,736,320)
2. University of Connecticut ($63,043,322)
3. Rutgers University-New Brunswick ($53,436,027)
4. University of South Florida-Main Campus ($43,494,246)
5. University of Central Florida ($37,821,564)
6. Southern Methodist University ($37,471,381)
7. University of Cincinnati-Main Campus ($37,367,392)
8. San Diego State University ($36,509,345)
9. University of Houston ($33,473,404)
10. Boise State University ($27,923,751)

Independents
University of Notre Dame ($94,507,919)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:19 am 
Offline
moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 15286
lonewolf371 wrote:
A little thing I put together and posted on another forum. Total revenue by conference/school based on the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act data:

SEC ($1,200,902,412)
1. The University of Alabama ($123,910,432)
2. University of Florida ($123,008,257)
3. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College ($106,421,671)
4. Auburn University ($103,982,441)
5. The University of Tennessee ($102,495,204)
6. University of Georgia ($92,341,067)
7. University of Arkansas ($91,768,113)
8. University of Kentucky ($84,878,315)
9. University of South Carolina-Columbia ($83,704,667)
10. Texas A & M University-College Station ($74,944,301)
11. University of Missouri-Columbia ($59,005,954)
12. Vanderbilt University ($55,632,098)
13. Mississippi State University ($49,893,731)
14. University of Mississippi Main Campus ($48,916,161)

Big Ten ($1,050,478,881)
1. Ohio State University-Main Campus ($131,815,819)
2. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ($122,486,490)
3. Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus ($116,118,026)
4. University of Wisconsin-Madison ($93,594,766)
5. University of Iowa ($92,903,555)
6. University of Nebraska-Lincoln ($83,679,756)
7. Michigan State University ($80,963,182)
8. University of Minnesota-Twin Cities ($78,924,683)
9. Indiana University-Bloomington ($70,172,641)
10. Purdue University-Main Campus ($66,066,303)
11. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ($57,539,367)
12. Northwestern University ($56,214,293)

ACC ($860,547,975)
1. Florida State University ($86,946,503)
2. University of Virginia-Main Campus ($78,439,006)
3. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ($71,369,784)
4. Duke University ($67,986,188)
5. Boston College ($64,078,272)
6. Clemson University ($61,174,977)
7. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ($61,077,122)
8. University of Miami ($60,325,003)
9. University of Maryland-College Park ($57,765,018)
10. University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus ($56,044,309)
11. North Carolina State University at Raleigh ($54,711,001)
12. Syracuse University ($51,433,840)
13. Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus ($46,910,364)
14. Wake Forest University ($42,286,588)

Pac-12 ($747,943,314)
1. University of Oregon ($85,740,068)
2. Stanford University ($81,125,476)
3. University of Southern California ($75,707,273)
4. University of Washington-Seattle Campus ($70,231,336)
5. University of California-Los Angeles ($66,003,893)
6. University of California-Berkeley ($65,006,338)
7. University of Colorado Boulder ($60,923,253)
8. University of Arizona ($58,274,431)
9. Arizona State University ($55,378,783)
10. Oregon State University ($50,843,837)
11. Washington State University ($40,617,093)
12. University of Utah ($38,091,533)

Big 12 ($737,535,914)
1. University of Texas at Austin ($150,295,932)
2. University of Oklahoma Norman Campus ($104,338,843)
3. Oklahoma State University-Main Campus ($70,123,206)
4. University of Kansas ($70,028,683)
5. Kansas State University ($68,875,266)
6. Baylor University ($59,859,235)
7. West Virginia University ($58,003,719)
8. Texas Christian University ($56,245,071)
9. Texas Tech University ($51,190,970)
10. Iowa State University ($48,574,989)

Big East (Football) ($458,276,752)
1. University of Louisville ($87,736,320)
2. University of Connecticut ($63,043,322)
3. Rutgers University-New Brunswick ($53,436,027)
4. University of South Florida-Main Campus ($43,494,246)
5. University of Central Florida ($37,821,564)
6. Southern Methodist University ($37,471,381)
7. University of Cincinnati-Main Campus ($37,367,392)
8. San Diego State University ($36,509,345)
9. University of Houston ($33,473,404)
10. Boise State University ($27,923,751)

Independents
University of Notre Dame ($94,507,919)


Notre Dame is much smaller than I would have thought. And shit Texas (and to a lesser extent OU) really carry the Big 12. I love how much lower A&M is than them despite their protestations of being just as popular.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
corrections wrote:
Notre Dame is much smaller than I would have thought. And shit Texas (and to a lesser extent OU) really carry the Big 12. I love how much lower A&M is than them despite their protestations of being just as popular.

I think if Notre Dame won a little bit more and started going to BCS bowls then they would probably get above the $100 million mark like the other major schools.

Also, Louisville has massive amounts of basketball money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:22 pm
Posts: 4022
yeah big 12!! it's great rg3 won because he actually deserved it, and because it's baylor. they would win like 5-6 games tops without him. i would've been beside myself if anyone except maybe ball beat him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 15286
Jess wrote:
yeah big 12!! it's great rg3 won because he actually deserved it, and because it's baylor. they would win like 5-6 games tops without him. i would've been beside myself if anyone except maybe ball beat him.


I would have been OK with Mathieu beating him but RGIII was the most deserving candidate and he won. Good kid, really fun to watch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
I picked Vanderbilt against Cincy. If Vandy loses, I'm going to be mega-pissed at crx.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:09 am
Posts: 1875
good god. just watched the alamo bowl. impressions as a husky fan:
1) fire nick holt
2)yeah yeah yeah RGIII is pretty good
3) Price has a pretty good future also, imo. A few errant passes, but no big mistakes and some big plays.


Last edited by ignatious on Fri Dec 30, 2011 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 1:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:07 am
Posts: 6835
Location: Seattle
hella touchdowns tonight


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:09 pm
Posts: 2388
Location: Michigan
Unbelievable game!

GO GREEN!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 15286
SanTropez wrote:
Unbelievable game!

GO GREEN!!!!!


Well done. Probably not a consolation given that it should be a BCS bowl but you guys are the only Big 10 team to put up any kind of fight today (South Carolina just murdered Nebraska and Ohio St. wasn't much better against Florida).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 511
Location: Georgia
Alabama lost to LSU, and they kept it much closer then any other team. LSU is the number one team in the nation.

Iowa state, on the other hand... is a 7 loss team, and really OSU's SOS is horrible outside OU. It's really disappointing seeing them play a rematch in the bcs, but it's still the two teams with the best two resumes in the championship. I just hope it isn't a total snoozer or a just a defensive contest like the last one, I don't think anyone wants to see that again.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 76  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JackLeg and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

DigitalDreamDoor Forum is one part of a music and movie list website whose owner has given its visitors
the privilege to discuss music and movies, and has no control and cannot in any way be held liable over
how, or by whom this board is used. If you read or see anything inappropriate that has been posted,
contact webmaster@digitaldreamdoor.com. Comments in the forum are reviewed before list updates.
Topics include rock music, metal, rap, hip-hop, blues, jazz, songs, albums, guitar, drums, musicians...


DDD Home Page | DDD Music Lists Page | DDD Movie Lists Page