Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Because hit singles in a few countries are a firm establishment of popularity, right?
It's certainly not the only way to establish popularity, but it's one, yes. Besides, while we heavily weight the US and the UK here, rap is big in a lot of places, not just a few countries.
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Metallica has never had a number 1 hit, and Queensryche has, so clearly Queensryche is more popular than Metallica...
First of all, Queensryche has never had a number one hit in the US or the UK. "Silent Lucidity" was a pretty big hit, but so was "Until It Sleeps", so your analogy fails.
But at any rate, if you're going to say that hits don't prove popularity, then you need something that counteracts it. I'm assuming that Metallica has sold a LOT more albums than Queensryche has. That's how we know they're more popular. That's why I provided album sales numbers, too.
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
So what if rap has a ton of hit singles in a few countries? That doesn't establish anything about worldwide popularity.
Actually, it does. So does the fact that rap albums are routinely among the biggest selling albums of the year, worldwide.
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Some extremely popular electronic artists don't even make albums and sell music strictly online, while others are generally downloaded or obtained outside of albums.
No--artists who sell music strictly online simply aren't "extremely popular".
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Look up the number of electronic artists worldwide, look, if it is even providable, of the most played genres worldwide, played anywhere.
Source?
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Electronica has an undeniable lead. Mariah Carey has more hit singles than The Who and Zeppelin combined, so clearly her popularity is greater than both of theirs combined as well, right?
Not quite--you also have to look at album sales and concert success, for example. But she's more popular than either, yes. But, again, I never said singles were the only thing.
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Popularity can't be measured strictly in hit singles, or strictly in album sales either, and if you check worldwide electronica/dance music downloaded and purchased, not a doubt in my mind exists that it far surpasses rap.
Then provide me some evidence of that, because I don't believe you.
And I notice that you've gone from "electronica" to "electronica/dance music", which is changing the subject. Dance pop is a very big genre, but I see no evidence that, say, Katy Perry or Rhianna is any more influenced by Kraftwerk than she is by Public Enemy.
Classic Rock Junkie wrote:
Nearly every person I know here in Beijing has a massive amount of electronica and dance downloaded, when I check back in the US, it's on par with rap now among college students and teens, with rap having the slight edge. That's on the east coast. Visting San Diego and LA, if you look at the new hit sensation known as 'gloving', and even among many teens and college students, even young adults, the amount of dance found in the area is more prevalent than rap, all the way up to san francisco, with large raves and conventions dedicated to dance music, the number of attendees and songs downloaded rivaling arguably that of rap concerts and performances in the area, which I know, is hard to believe.
You're giving me your personal experience. I have no way of knowing how typical that is. Give me numbers. Give me sources. Give me evidence.